Position paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 3

Position paper - Essay Example (,McGovern, 16). The company mine was sprinkled only when the dust became thick enough to prevent the passage of the mules because, they believed and insisted Starkville was nongaseous. They insisted that their mine was not like Starkville mine. As much as the strike was crucial for the workers and other stakeholders to voice complains. Colorado Fuel and Mining Company on its side believed they were no genuine ground for complain as they had taken care of their employees the right way. In conclusion, the company did not support the strike and definitely did not agree with stakeholders like united Mine workers of America, Industrial workers of the world among others on workers demand. The United State was concerned with internal affairs of the country as it was strongly interested in investing in that country. This investments mainly included; the Mexican oil. Further, these investments had grown up to a billion dollars by 1913(McGovern, 48). Due to this situation, President Wilson took a position of warning Mexican president on acting fast before April 19, whereby if actions were not taken by then. He was to take the situation to Congress for further action. Consequently, since the actions taken by Mexican president did not work, Wilson on April 20 sent a message to Congress to inquire for right to use armed force. The president of United State took the position that; United States seeks to maintain its dignity and authority. Since they were only interested as United State wished to keep great States and wherever else it may be employed for mankind benefit. The president of the United States Wilson took the position of ensuring peace and ensuing law and orders is maintained so as to protect the innocent and also, to ensure the market does not close down as it would greatly affect the economy of the United States (McGovern, 48). In conclusion, Unite States’ business interest required stability in

Public Policing Vs Private Security Comparison Paper Essay

Public Policing Vs Private Security Comparison Paper - Essay Example Such programs include crime prevention and drug awareness. They have the authority to search, arrest, and detain individuals under the provisions of territorial and other police acts. They have the integral responsibility to protect the public property and places. On the other hand, private investigators usually carry out investigations to locate missing persons or obtain information for civil and legal litigation cases. Some of the other important services rendered by them include, ‘investigating corporate fraud, endowing with risk management consultations, and executing security measures to defend property from theft and fire’ (‘Private investigator, 2011). These personnel are not recruited by the government; instead they are directly employed by security companies and public administration industries. The private security personnel renders their services in protecting the ‘mass private property’, which means venues that are privately owned or run, b ut used widely by the public such as the privately owned airports, sporting arenas, or shopping malls. In the same way they offer many services offered by the public police, but they act only on behalf of the employer and not on behalf of the public. Some Distinctive Features Private security professionals like the ASIS helps to develop security management standards and guidelines. Their commission works with numeral national and international standards-setting organizations to advance their security practices. Utilizing the knowledge and experience, they practice worldwide through development of standards and guidelines (ASIS IT security, July 2011). The primary objective of private security officials is to keep up order and enforce rules at public events and concerns. They also provide a vast variety of services like providing armored car service for transporting valuables, controlling the access to venues, and protecting the property from theft and vandalism. Usually corporate co mpanies directly employ the security personnel for their protection and safety. They are also employed at public administration, banking companies, entertainment and recreation industry, transportation and warehousing, healthcare and social assistance, and accommodation and food services. Private security personnel, acting on behalf of the employer have many of the same cranial law enforcement powers as public police have. They are legally able to arrest and detain individuals. The trespass laws, in particular, are frequently used by private securities, because most of such laws allow them to arrest the trespassers. The Supreme Court of Canada defines that â€Å"the trespass acts are the workhorse of private security services in their patrol of the shopping malls, airports, sports stadiums and other private spaces where the public tends to congregate†( In search of security, 2006). Major Differences in Leadership On comparing both policing, we find that public policing and pr ivate security have many distinctive features with regard to leadership. Public policing is the ability to implement the law and maintain order in the society; whereas, private securities are paid agencies which perform defensive and loss-preclusion duties. Though both forces are handling different services and duties, the ultimate goal is to maintain a composed and tranquil atmosphere in the society. In the same way, as Allen and Sawhney (2009, p. 40) point out, the day-to-day activities of police and detectives differ according to